Download document: Understanding self-harm and suicide content online
144.9 kb - PDF
The internet can be an invaluable space for individuals experiencing self-harm and suicidal feelings. It provides opportunities to access information, find options for support, and provides a platform to speak openly about difficult feelings that can be challenging to discuss face to face. However, it can also carry potential risks by presenting opportunities to access graphic content, details around methods of harm, and content that glorifies or promotes self-harm and suicide. Access to such content can be distressing, triggering and may act to encourage, maintain or exacerbate self-harm and suicidal behaviours.
Any deliberate act of self-poisoning or self-injury without suicidal intent. This excludes accidents, substance misuse and eating disorders, as well as episodes of self-harm where the person was trying to take their own life.
The act of intentionally ending one’s life. This is caused by many factors, including depression and mental illness, stress, financial problems, relationship breakdown, bereavement and abuse.
* Self-harm can be defined differently, and some definitions may include eating disorders and drug misuse. For example, in some clinical and academic settings (particularly in the UK), the term ‘self-harm’ refers to when a person harms themselves, irrespective of whether they do so with the intention of taking their own lives. The important thing is that sites and platforms have clear definitions that can be understood by users.
User-generated self-harm and suicide content can take many different forms online such as:
Some of the reasons that users may post, search for, or engage with self-harm and suicide content include:
Users may also stumble upon content by accident or engage with it for more harmful reasons, such as to find information about methods of harm.
Whilst lots of self-harm and suicide related content can be extremely helpful for users and a part of their recovery, there are some risks associated with particular types of content:
Promotion, encouragement or glorification of self-harm and suicide – content that promotes or portrays self-harm and suicide in positive ways, whether intentionally or unintentionally, can be harmful for users by making the behaviours appear more appealing. Examples include portraying self-harm or suicide as effective ways to end distress and encouraging other users to try these behaviours.
Sharing methods of harm can put users at increased risk. This includes sharing details or instructions around methods, suggested equipment or places to harm yourself, and comparisons of the effectiveness of different methods. Research suggests that when researching methods of suicide online, users are likely to find resources that instruct or encourage suicide, which can distract attention away from signposts to available support i.
Social contagion – some evidence suggests that content presenting self-harm and suicide behaviours may be ‘contagious’ to other users viewing it, young people being more susceptible to this than other groups ii. The contagion effect may be precipitated by over-identification with the user who is posting. This not only relates to self-harm and suicide behaviours but also to feelings of distress.
Imitative or copycat suicides iii – if methods of suicide or places where a suicide took place are widely discussed and described online, it poses risks that other users may try to replicate it.
While research is limited, some evidence suggests that young people may be at increased risk from viewing self-harm and suicide content online. Research conducted by Samaritans and University of Bristol found that 26% of young people who had presented to hospital for self-harm or a suicide attempt had used the internet in relation to this. This was compared to 8.4% of adults iv.
Further research is needed to explore this and identify other groups who may also be at increased risk.
Understanding the impact of self-harm and suicide content online is complex and the evidence base has mixed findings regarding what content is considered harmful and for whom v. What can be helpful for one user can be extremely distressing to others. User’s perceptions on how harmful content is may also depend on factors such as the context of the content, their current level of distress and the volume of self-harm and suicide content they view.
In England and Wales, under the 1961 Suicide Act, it is an offence to encourage or assist the suicide or attempted suicide of another person vi, therefore, any content that intentionally encourages a person to end their life would be considered illegal content.
* This refers to content that is legal but harmful in the UK context. The law on suicide varies between jurisdictions.
While any content has the potential to be distressing, research shows that content most likely to be harmful includes:
There is also a grey area where less is known about the potential positive and negative impacts of content on users. This includes:
While there is growing focus and awareness of the potential harm of self-harm and suicide content online, it is important to recognise the benefits that users can experience from online spaces. Research tells us that helpful content includes:
i Marchant, A., Hawton, K., Stewart, A., Montgomery, P., Singaravelu, V., Lloyd, K., Purdy, N., Daine, K. and John, A., 2017. A systematic review of the relationship between internet use, self-harm and suicidal behaviour in young people: The good, the bad and the unknown. PloS one, 12(8), p.e0181722
ii Niedzwiedz, C., Haw, C., Hawton, K. and Platt, S., 2014. The definition and epidemiology of clusters of suicidal behavior: a systematic review. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 44(5), pp.569-581.
iii Biddle, L., Gunnell, D., Owen-Smith, A., Potokar, J., Longson, D., Hawton, K., Kapur, N. and Donovan, J., 2012. Information sources used by the suicidal to inform choice of method. Journal of affective disorders, 136(3), pp.702-709.
iv Padmanathan, P., Biddle, L., Carroll, R., Derges, J., Potokar, J. and Gunnell, D., 2018. Suicide and self-harm related internet use. Crisis
v Marchant, A., Hawton, K., Stewart, A., Montgomery, P., Singaravelu, V., Lloyd, K., Purdy, N., Daine, K. and John, A., 2017. A systematic review of the relationship between internet use, self-harm and suicidal behaviour in young people: The good, the bad and the unknown. PloS one, 12(8), p.e0181722.
vi The Suicide Act 1961, section 3(3)
Download our information sheet for advice on understanding self-harm and suicide content online:
144.9 kb - PDF